-
Observational Study
Communication between primary and secondary care: deficits and danger.
- Elsa Dinsdale, Ailish Hannigan, Ray O'Connor, Jane O'Doherty, Liam Glynn, Monica Casey, Peter Hayes, Dervla Kelly, Walter Cullen, and Andrew O'Regan.
- Graduate Entry Medical School, Department of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
- Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 19; 37 (1): 63-68.
BackgroundTimely and accurate communication between primary and secondary care is essential for delivering high-quality patient care.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the content contained in both referral and response letters between primary and secondary care and measure this against the recommended national guidelines.MethodsUsing an observational design, senior medical students and their general practice supervisors applied practice management software to identify 100 randomly selected adults, aged greater than 50 years, from a generated list of consults over a 2-year period (2013-2015). All data included in referral and response letters for these adults were examined and compared with the gold standard templates that were informed by international guidelines.ResultsData from 3293 referral letters and 2468 response letters from 68 general practices and 17 hospitals were analysed. The median time that had elapsed between a patient being referred and receiving a response letter was 4 weeks, ranging from 1 week for Emergency Department referral letters to 7 weeks for orthopaedic surgery referral letters. Referral letters included the reason for referral (98%), history of complaint (90%) and current medications (82%). Less commonly included were management prior to referral (65%) and medication allergies (57%). The majority of response letters included information on investigations (73%), results (70%) and follow-up plan (85%). Less commonly, response letters included medication changes (30%), medication lists (33%) and secondary diagnoses (13%).ConclusionsFuture research should be aimed at developing robust strategies to addressing communication gaps reported in this study.© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.