-
Review Meta Analysis
Impact of serum SP-A and SP-D levels on comparison and prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Kai Wang, Qing Ju, Jing Cao, Wenze Tang, and Jian Zhang.
- aDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an Shanxi bDepartment of Healthcare Respiratory Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong University, Jinan, P.R. China cDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
- Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun 1; 96 (23): e7083.
Background And ObjectiveIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has a poor prognosis in general; however, it is heterogeneous to detect relative biomarkers for predicting the disease progression. Serum biomarkers can be conveniently collected to detect and help to differentially diagnose IPF and predict IPF prognosis. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the use of serum surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A and SP-D) for differential diagnosis and prognosis of IPF.MethodsRelevant articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases and reviewed by 2 independent readers. Standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to assess the difference in serum levels of SP-A/D among patients with IPF, when compared to patients with non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary infection, and healthy control. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI were used to compare the relative risk of mortality.ResultsTwenty-one articles (totalling 1289 IPF patients) were included in final meta-analysis. Serum SP-A levels were significantly higher in patients with IPF than in patients with non-IPF ILD (SMD: 1.108 [0.584, 1.632], P < .001), or pulmonary infection (SMD: 1.320 [0.999, 1.640], P < .001) and healthy controls (SMD: 2.802 [1.901, 3.702], P < .001). There was no significant difference in serum SP-D levels between patients with IPF and those with non-IPF ILD patients (SMD: 0.459 [-0.000, 0.919], P = .050). Serum SP-D levels were significantly higher in patients with IPF than in patients with pulmonary infection (SMD: 1.308 [0.813, 1.803], P < .001) and healthy controls (SMD: 2.235 [1.739, 2.731], P < .001). Risk of death in patients with IPF and elevated serum SP-A was increased 39% compared to patients with low SP-A groups. Elevated SP-D increased risk by 111% when compared to low SP-D. In acute exacerbation of IPF, serum SP-A/D were higher than those in stable stage. The comparisons and prognosis might be different in Asian and Caucasian patients.ConclusionsSerum SP-A/D detection might be useful for differential diagnosis and prediction of survival in patients with IPF.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.