• Michael Truchot, Baptiste Balança, Pierre François Wey, Karim Tazarourte, François Lecomte, Arnaud Le Goff, Simon Leigh-Smith, Jean Jacques Lehot, Thomas Rimmele, and Jean Christophe Cejka.
• Centre Lyonnais d'Enseignement par la Simulation en Santé, SAMSEI, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 8 avenue Rockefeller- 69372 LYON CEDEX 08, Lyon, France.
• Mil Med. 2020 Aug 14; 185 (7-8): e1077-e1082.

IntroductionThe French army has implemented an algorithm based on the acronym "MARCHE RYAN," each letter standing for a key action to complete in order to help first care providers during emergency casualty care. On the battlefield, the risk of error is increased, and the use of cognitive aids (CAs) might be helpful to avoid distraction. We investigated the effect of using a digital CA (MAX, for Medical Assistance eXpert) by combat casualty care providers on their technical and nontechnical performances during the early management of simulated war wounds, compared to their memory and training alone.Materials And MethodsWe conducted a randomized, controlled, unblinded study between July 2016 and February 2017. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ethical Board of Desgenettes Army Training Hospital (14.06.2017 n°385) and was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03483727). It took place during medicalization training in hostile environment ("MEDICHOS") in Chamonix Mont-Blanc and in the first aid training center in La Valbonne military base (France). Each participant had to deal with two different scenarios, one with MAX (MAX+) and the other without (MAX-). Scenarios were held using either high-fidelity patient simulators or actors as wounded patients. The primary outcome was participants' technical performance rated as their adherence to the MARCHE RYAN procedure (maximum 100%). The secondary outcome was the nontechnical performance according to the Ottawa crisis resource management Global Rating Scale (maximum 42).ResultsTechnical performance was significantly higher in the MAX+ scenarios (70.60 IQR [63.70-73.56] than in the MAX- scenarios (56.25 IQR [52.88-62.09], p = 0.002). The Ottawa scores were significantly higher in the MAX+ scenarios (31.50 IQR [29.50-33.75]) than in the MAX- scenarios (29.50 IQR [24.50-32.00], p = 0.031).ConclusionsThe use of a digital CA by combat casualty care providers improved technical and nontechnical performances during field training of simulated crises. Following recommendations on the design and use of CA, regular team training would improve fluidity in the use and acceptance of an aid, by a highly drilled professional corporation with a strong culture of leadership. Digital CA should be tested at a larger scale in order to validate their contribution to real combat casualty care.© Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

6 keywords...

hide…