• Chest · Jan 2021

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Survivors of intensive care with type 2 diabetes and the effect of shared care follow-up clinics: the SWEET-AS randomized controlled pilot study.

    • Ali Abdelhamid Yasmine Y Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; ICU, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department o, Liza K Phillips, Mary G White, Jeffrey Presneill, Michael Horowitz, and Adam M Deane.
    • Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; ICU, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: yasmine.aliabdelhamid@mh.org.au.
    • Chest. 2021 Jan 1; 159 (1): 174-185.

    BackgroundFollow-up clinics after ICU admission have demonstrated limited benefit. However, existing trials have evaluated heterogeneous cohorts and used physicians who had limited training in outpatient care.Research QuestionWhat are the effects of a "shared-care" intensivist-endocrinologist clinic for ICU survivors with type 2 diabetes on process measures and clinical outcomes 6 months after hospital discharge, and is it feasible to conduct a larger trial?Study Design And MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, single-center pilot study with blinded outcome assessment. Patients with type 2 diabetes, who required ≥ 5 days of ICU care (mixed medical-surgical ICU) and survived to ICU discharge, were eligible. Participants were randomized to attendance at the shared-care clinic 1 month after hospital discharge or usual care. Six months after hospital discharge, participants were assessed for outcomes including glycated hemoglobin, neuropathy, nephropathy, quality of life, return to employment, frailty, and health-care use. The primary outcome was participant recruitment and retention.ResultsDuring an 18-month period, 42 of 82 eligible patients (51%) were recruited. Four participants (10%) withdrew before assessment at 6 months and 11 (26%) died. At 6 months, only 18 of 38 participants who did not withdraw (47%) were living independently without support, and 24 (63%) required at least one subsequent hospital admission. In the intervention group (n = 21), 16 (76%) attended the clinic. Point estimates did not indicate that the intervention improved glycated hemoglobin (+5.6 mmol/mol; 95% CI, -6.3 to 17; P = .36) or quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey physical summary score, 32 [9] vs. 32 [7]; P = 1.0).InterpretationOutcomes for ICU survivors with type 2 diabetes are poor. Because of low participation and high mortality, a larger trial of a shared-care follow-up clinic in this cohort, using the present design, does not appear feasible.Trial RegistryAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR); No.: ACTRN12616000206426; URL: www.anzctr.org.au.Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…