• Br J Gen Pract · May 2008

    Multicenter Study

    Factors associated with enablement in general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely-collected data.

    • Nicola Mead, Peter Bower, and Martin Roland.
    • National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester. nicki.mead@manchester.ac.uk
    • Br J Gen Pract. 2008 May 1; 58 (550): 346-52.

    BackgroundQuality-improvement activities are most often focused on clinical quality indicators. However, patient evaluations are important additional indicators of the quality of general practice consultations, including measures of satisfaction or enablement (that is, the extent to which the consultation enhances the patient's feelings of confidence and ability to cope). There is limited evidence concerning factors associated with enablement in UK general practice.AimTo identify patient and practice characteristics associated with enablement scores following general practice consultations.Design Of StudyCross-sectional survey using a large routinely-collected dataset of patient evaluations of general practice (190,038 individual patient responses).SettingA total of 1031 UK general practices.MethodRelationships between health, demographic factors, evaluations of general practice care, and patient self-reported enablement were estimated using multiple regression.ResultsThe primary predictor of enablement was positive patient evaluation of the GPs' communication. Reported continuity of care accounted for a lower proportion of the variance. Of the included patient demographic variables, ethnicity was a key predictor, with patients from minority ethnic groups reporting greater enablement once other factors were controlled.ConclusionThe current results provide support for the construct validity of the enablement measure. However, if enablement is to become a valid and useful measure of quality, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms by which enablement is increased in certain patients and practices. Detailed qualitative research may also be required to explain the relatively high scores of ethnic minority responders, despite lower overall satisfaction scores, and to understand why some items included in the enablement measure are regarded as 'not applicable' by a substantial minority of patients.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…