• Zhongguo Gu Shang · Aug 2020

    [Analysis of clinical efficacy of C3 expanded half lamina excision combined with unilateral open-door laminoplasty for multiple segmental cervical spinal cord compression syndrome].

    • Ming Fang, Jian-Meng Lu, Xing-Wu Wang, Yong-Li Wei, Wu-Liang Yu, and Min-Hao Lu.
    • Department of Spinal Surgery, the Hospital Affiliated to Ningbo University Medical College, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang, China.
    • Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020 Aug 25; 33 (8): 735-40.

    ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of C3 expanded half lamina excision combined with unilateral open door laminoplasty for multiple segmental cervical spinal cord compression syndrome.MethodsThe clinical data of 58 patients with multiple segmental cervical spinal cord compression syndrome underwent surgical treatment between September 2014 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 34 males and 24 females with a mean age of 64.4 years old (ranged from 46 to 78 years old). Among them, 28 cases received the surgery of C3 expanded half lamina excision combined with C4-C7 unilateral open-door laminoplasty (improvedgroup), and 30 cases received a single C3-C7 unilateral open-door laminoplasty (traditional group). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications including C5 nerve root palsy and axial symptoms were compared between two groups. To evaluate the situation of the imaging indicators by measuring the space available for the spinal cord through cross sectional MRI of cervical spine at the narrowest segment of C3 (including intervertebral disc levels of C3, 4). Pre- and post-operative Japanese Orthopedic Association(JOA) score, Neck Disability Index(NDI) score, and improvement rate of neurological function, were recorded and analyzed between the two groups.ResultsAll the patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months with an average of(14.5±1.8) months for improved group and (14.5±1.9) months for traditional group, and no significant difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and C5 nerve root palsy between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time (119±10) min vs (126±12) min and axial symptoms 7.1%(2/28) vs 26.6%(8/30) was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Preoperative and postoperative space available for the spinal cord of C3 was (93.61±9.02) mm3 and (153.50±12.76) mm3 respectively, which was obtained obvious improvement in all patients(P<0.05). At the final follow up, JOA scores of improved group and traditional group were 14.36±1.70 and 14.03±1.82 respectively, and NDI scores were 10.36±2.55 and 12.47±3.46 respectively, there was significant difference between two groups (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between two groups for the improvement rate (68.36±0.12)%VS (65.01±0.12)%of neurological function(P>0.05).ConclusionC3 expanded half lamina excision combined with unilateral open-door laminoplasty is an effective method to treat multiple segmental cervical spinal cord compression syndrome, for it can not only fully relieved spinal cord compression, but also achievedgood effect in preventing complications such as axial symptoms by reducing stripping of muscles from C2 spinous process.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.