• S L Lansman, J N McCullough, K H Nguyen, D Spielvogel, J J Klein, J D Galla, M A Ergin, and R B Griepp.
• Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York 10029, USA.
• Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999 Jun 1; 67 (6): 1975-8; discussion 1979-80.

BackgroundThis series consists of a 12-year experience with a policy of identifying and replacing the aortic segment containing the primary intimal tear for repair of acute aortic dissection.MethodsPatients with type A dissection underwent urgent surgery. Patients with type B dissection were referred for surgery based on selective criteria, including aortic dilatation greater than 5 cm. A classification system for acute dissection is described that specifies the site of intimal tear while retaining the clinical relevance of the Stanford system.ResultsOf 168 acute dissections, 139 were type A and 29 were type B. The site of intimal tear was as follows: ascending aorta, 83 cases; arch, 32 cases; descending aorta, 29 cases; multiple tears, 11 cases (10 included arch tears); no tear (intramural hematoma), 6 cases; not noted, 7 cases. Only 60% of acute type A dissections arose from solitary intimal tears in the ascending aorta, whereas 30% had arch tears. Hospital mortality for type A dissection was 13.7% (18.8% for arch tears, NS) and 0% for type B. False lumen patency was 57.1% for type A dissection and 18.8% for type B dissection (p = 0.002), yet survival was similar for these groups. Ten-year survival for type A dissection with arch tear (0.51 +/- 0.12) was lower than 10-year survival for type A dissection with ascending tear (0.74 +/- 0.05; p = 0.77), and significantly lower than for type A dissection with descending tear (0.88 +/- 0.12; p = 0.029).ConclusionsSystematic resection of the primary tear yielded similar hospital mortality, 5-year survival, and aorta-related event-free survival rates for subtypes of acute type A dissection. Excellent results were obtained with a selective approach to type B dissection.

19 keywords...

hide…