• Arch Cardiovasc Dis · Oct 2019

    Evaluation of the efficacy of a self-training programme in focus cardiac ultrasound with simulator.

    • Anne Bernard, Pascale Chemaly, Fanny Dion, Said Laribi, Francis Remerand, Denis Angoulvant, and Fabrice Ivanes.
    • Service de Cardiologie, CHRU de Tours, 37044 Tours, France; EA4245, Loire Valley Cardiovascular Collaboration, Université de Tours, 37000 Tours, France; Centre Régional d'Enseignement par la Simulation en Santé, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Tours, 37032 Tours, France. Electronic address: anne.bernard@univ-tours.fr.
    • Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Oct 1; 112 (10): 576-584.

    BackgroundFocus cardiac ultrasound is a great tool for quick evaluation of cardiac function in acute settings with limited time and expertise in echocardiography. Adequate training is essential for physicians willing to use this imaging technique.AimThe goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of a self-training programme using a cardiac ultrasound simulator.MethodsThirty-five trainees in cardiology, emergency medicine or anaesthesiology entered the programme, which started with an e-learning lecture on focus cardiac ultrasound, with practice on a simulator, followed by implementation on patients, and ended with self-training in image analysis on an online platform. A post-test evaluation was carried out at the end of the theoretical training, followed by a final live evaluation on patients (timed acquisition of the five reference views used in focus cardiac ultrasound, grading each view on a scale of 1 to 5). Trainees were also evaluated online regarding their interpretation of 20 video clips.ResultsThe median (interquartile range) interpretability scores following simulator training were 5 (4-5) for the parasternal long-axis view, 5 (4-5) for the apical four-chamber view, and 4 (4-5) for the subcostal window. Interpretability was significantly inferior in the live evaluation compared with the post-test evaluation, except for the parasternal long-axis and subcostal views. The mean score for the video clips (out of 20) was 14.5±2.4.ConclusionsAfter a short self-training programme, trainees were able to acquire the main views of focus cardiac ultrasound with sufficient quality and in a short time period.Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.