• Neurosurgery · Aug 2015

    192 Etiologies of Early Ventricular Shunt Malfunctions and Proposal of a New Quality Metric.

    • Paul Klimo, Garrett T Venable, and Nicholas Rossi.
    • Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug 1;62 Suppl 1:230.

    IntroductionComplications from ventriculoperitoneal shunting are well-known and costly. Revision rates at certain time periods (eg 30, 60, and 180 days) have been proposed as quality metrics. The purpose of this study was to perform a detailed analysis of shunt failure etiology in an effort to produce a more appropriate quality metric.MethodsLe Bonhuer Children's Hospital records were reviewed to identify all patients admitted for shunt-related procedures (January 2010-February 2014). Shunt malfunctions within 90 days of the index procedure were reviewed thoroughly to identify the root cause of shunt malfunction. Extracted data for each index and revision procedure included demographic, clinical and operative.ResultsWe identified 188 failures within 90 days of the index shunt operation, the majority of them occurring within 30 days (70.2%). The most common types of failure included surgical site infection (14.9%), proximal catheter (43.6%), valve malfunction (12.2%), distal catheter (15.4%), and some combination (6.3%). Potentially preventable shunt failures, which included malpositioned proximal and distal catheters and infection, comprised 29.8% of the 90-day failures.ConclusionAn overall shunt revision rate at any time period is not an appropriate quality metric. However, we have identified a new metric the preventable shunt revision rate (PSRR) at 90 days as a metric that is meaningful, measureable, and modifiable. It is the one that all institutions should track and institute processes to minimize.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.