• Pediatrics · Oct 1993

    Meta Analysis

    The futility of the chest radiograph in the febrile infant without respiratory symptoms.

    • R T Bramson, T L Meyer, M L Silbiger, J G Blickman, and E Halpern.
    • Department of Radiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa General Hospital.
    • Pediatrics. 1993 Oct 1; 92 (4): 524-6.

    ObjectiveMajor pediatric textbooks advocate a chest radiograph as part of the diagnostic evaluation for a sepsis workup for febrile infants less than 3 months old. Very few studies have addressed the value of performing a chest radiograph in this situation. Two studies previously published lack the numbers to statistically justify a conclusion about the need to perform a chest radiograph in the febrile infant.MethodsEvaluated were 197 febrile infants 3 months old or less with a history, physical examination, chest radiograph, and other laboratory studies to determine the cause of their fever. This group of infants was combined with the group of infants from two similar studies published previously in the literature using cumulative meta-analysis. The combined group resulted in 617 infants.ResultsThe combined group of infants had 361 infants who had no clinical evidence of pulmonary disease on history or physical examination. All 361 infants had normal chest radiograph. These results gave a 95% confidence interval that the chance of a positive chest radiograph in a patient with no pulmonary symptoms would occur less than 1.02% of the time.ConclusionsThe generally advocated policy of obtaining a chest radiograph as part of the sepsis workup in febrile infants should be discontinued, and chest radiographs should be obtained only in febrile infants who have clinical indications of pulmonary disease.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…