• J Neuromuscul Dis · Jan 2018

    Evaluator Training and Reliability for SMA Global Nusinersen Trials1.

    • Allan M Glanzman, Elena S Mazzone, Sally Dunaway Young, Richard Gee, Kristy Rose, Anna Mayhew, Leslie Nelson, Chris Yun, Katie Alexander, Basil T Darras, Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham, Gihan Tennekoon, John W Day, Richard S Finkel, Eugenio Mercuri, Darryl C De Vivo, Ron Baldwin, Kathie M Bishop, and Jacqueline Montes.
    • Department of Physical Therapy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
    • J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018 Jan 1; 5 (2): 159-166.

    BackgroundTraining methodology was established to optimize reliability of outcome measures in the nusinersen clinical trials. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND), Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE), and Revised Upper Limb (RULM) were primary or secondary outcomes.MethodsVideo review, quarterly conference calls, and item scoring checks supported evaluator competence. Baseline and screening along with video review established intra and inter-rater reliability.ResultsInter and intra-rater reliability were both excellent. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged between 0.906-0.994 across initial training meetings and 0.824-0.996 across annual retraining meetings. This was similar for CHOP INTEND (ICC = 0.824-0.951), HFMSE (ICC = 0.981-0.996), and RULM (ICC = 0.966-0.990). Intra-rater reliability for the CHOP INTEND, HFMSE, and RULM were ICC = 0.895 (95% CI: 0.852-0.926; n = 116), ICC = 0.959 (95% CI: 0.942-0.971; n = 125), and ICC = 0.948 (95% CI: 0.927-0.963; n = 126) respectively.ConclusionsRigorous evaluator training ensures reliability of assessment of subjects with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in multicenter international trials.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…