• Marco Monticone, Emilia Ambrosini, Howard Vernon, Roberto Brunati, Barbara Rocca, Calogero Foti, and Simona Ferrante.
• Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute of Lissone, Institute of Care and Research (IRCCS), Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Via Monsignor Bernasconi, 16, 20035, Lissone, Milan, Italy. marco.monticone@fsm.it.
• Eur Spine J. 2015 Dec 1; 24 (12): 2821-7.

PurposeTo evaluate the responsiveness and minimal important changes (MICs) for the Italian Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Neck Pain Disability Scale (NPDS) as well as which questionnaire was the most responsive in subjects with chronic neck pain (NP).MethodsAt the beginning and end of an 8-week rehabilitation programme, 200 patients completed the NDI and NPDS. After the programme, the global perceived effect (GPE) was also evaluated and collapsed to produce a dichotomous outcome (improved vs. stable). Responsiveness was calculated by distribution [effect size (ES); standardised response mean (SRM)] and anchor-based methods (ROC curves; correlations between change scores of NPDS and NDI, and GPE). ROC curves were also used to compute the best cutoff levels between improved and stable subjects (MICs).ResultsThe ES was 0.66 and 0.73, and the SRM was 1.09-1.26 for the NDI and NPDS, respectively. The ROC analyses revealed AUCs of 0.96 and 0.91 for the NDI and NPDS, respectively; the MICs were 7-percentage points for the NDI (sensitivity: 98%; specificity: 81%) and 10 for NPDS (93; 83%), showing equivalent responsiveness properties. Baseline NPDS scores did not affect MIC estimate for the NPDS, while, for the NDI, higher MICs were found for patients with worst disability levels. Correlations between change scores of the NDI and NPDS and GPE were, respectively, high (0.71) and moderate (0.59).ConclusionsThe Italian NDI and NPDS were equally sensitive in detecting clinical changes in subjects with chronic NP undergoing rehabilitation. We recommend taking the MICs into account when assessing patient improvement or planning studies in this clinical context.

16 keywords...

hide…