• J Gen Intern Med · May 2021

    Predicting Self-Rated Health Across the Life Course: Health Equity Insights from Machine Learning Models.

    • Cheryl R Clark, Mark J Ommerborn, Kaitlyn Moran, Katherine Brooks, Jennifer Haas, David W Bates, and Adam Wright.
    • Center for Community Health and Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120, Boston, MA, USA. crclark@partners.org.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May 1; 36 (5): 1181-1188.

    BackgroundSelf-rated health is a strong predictor of mortality and morbidity. Machine learning techniques may provide insights into which of the multifaceted contributors to self-rated health are key drivers in diverse groups.ObjectiveWe used machine learning algorithms to predict self-rated health in diverse groups in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), to understand how machine learning algorithms might be used explicitly to examine drivers of self-rated health in diverse populations.DesignWe applied three common machine learning algorithms to predict self-rated health in the 2017 BRFSS survey, stratified by age, race/ethnicity, and sex. We replicated our process in the 2016 BRFSS survey.ParticipantsWe analyzed data from 449,492 adult participants of the 2017 BRFSS survey.Main MeasuresWe examined area under the curve (AUC) statistics to examine model fit within each group. We used traditional logistic regression to predict self-rated health associated with features identified by machine learning models.Key ResultsEach algorithm, regularized logistic regression (AUC: 0.81), random forest (AUC: 0.80), and support vector machine (AUC: 0.81), provided good model fit in the BRFSS. Predictors of self-rated health were similar by sex and race/ethnicity but differed by age. Socioeconomic features were prominent predictors of self-rated health in mid-life age groups. Income [OR: 1.70 (95% CI: 1.62-1.80)], education [OR: 2.02 (95% CI: 1.89, 2.16)], physical activity [OR: 1.52 (95% CI: 1.46-1.58)], depression [OR: 0.66 (95% CI: 0.63-0.68)], difficulty concentrating [OR: 0.62 (95% CI: 0.58-0.66)], and hypertension [OR: 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57-0.61)] all predicted the odds of excellent or very good self-rated health.ConclusionsOur analysis of BRFSS data show social determinants of health are prominent predictors of self-rated health in mid-life. Our work may demonstrate promising practices for using machine learning to advance health equity.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,706,642 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.