• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Jun 2021

    Review

    Expert consensus on peri-operative myocardial injury screening in noncardiac surgery: A literature review with expert consensus.

    • Christian Puelacher, Bollen PintoBernardoB, Nicholas L Mills, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Ekaterine Popova, Andreas Duma, Peter Nagele, Torbjørn Omland, Angelika Hammerer-Lercher, and Giovanna Lurati Buse.
    • From the Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital of Basel, University of Basel; Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University Basel, Basel (CP), Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (CP, BBP), Geneva Perioperative Basic, Translational and Clinical Research Group (BB-P), BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science and Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (NLM), Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (ED), Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain (EP), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (AD), Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA (PN), Department of Cardiology, Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (TO), Institute of Laboratory Medicine, County Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland (A-HL), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (GLB).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Jun 1; 38 (6): 600608600-608.

    AbstractPeri-operative myocardial injury, detected by dynamic and elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) concentrations, is a common complication of noncardiac surgery that is strongly associated with 30-day mortality. Although active screening for peri-operative myocardial injury has been suggested in recent guidelines, clinical implementation remains tentative due to a lack of examples on how to tackle such an interdisciplinary project at a local level. Moreover, consensus on which assay and cTn cut-off values should be used has not yet been reached, and guidance on whom to screen is lacking. In this article, we aim to summarise local examples of successfully implemented cTn screening practices and review the current literature in order to provide information and suggestions for patient selection, organisation of a screening programme, caveats and a potential management pathway.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.