• M Borel, B Veber, C Hervé, J-P Rigaud, G Moutel, N Rey, and B Dureuil.
• Département d'anesthésie-réanimation et Samu, CHU Charles-Nicolle, 1, rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France. marie.borel@chu-rouen.fr
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 Mar 1;31(3):203-7.

ObjectivesTo describe the condition of the decision-making of admission and non-admission in intensive care unit.Study DesignNon-interventional observational cohort.Patients And MethodsRetrospective analysis of declarative terms of decision-making of patients admitted or denied in a surgical intensive care unit. The decision-making in the two admitted or not admitted troops was compared.ResultsThat it is during a non-admission (149 decisions) or of an admission (149 decisions), the decision-making process was not very different. The instruction of the files was regarded as collegial in nearly 80% of the cases by the intensivist in load. The dialogue precedent the decision utilized generally several speakers but who could be residents. The participation of the patient and/or his close relations, as that of the ancillary medical personnel was rare. No person of confidence or anticipated directive was quoted. More than 50% of the decisions were taken within a time lower than 30 minutes. The decisions of non-admission were considered to be more difficult than the decisions of admission. Traceability was not automatically given.ConclusionThus, this study shows that in its current form the intensivists of the service estimate that in the majority of the cases the instruction of the files was collegial. However, the conditions of seniorisation of the decision, the collection of opinion of the patient and/or his close relations and the traceability are tracks of improvement to be implemented in certain circumstances of admission or non-admission.Copyright © 2011 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…