• Nicolas J Prat, Andrew D Meyer, Nichole K Ingalls, Julie Trichereau, Joseph J DuBose, and Andrew P Cap.
• From the Coagulation and Blood Research (N.J.P., A.D.M., A.P.C.), United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR), Fort Sam Houston, Texas; French Armed Forces Institute of Biomedical Research (IRBA) (N.J.P., J.T.), Paris, France; Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics (A.D.M.), University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas; Northwest Surgical Specialists LLP (N.K.I.), Springfield, Oregon; and Travis Air Force Base (J.J.D.); and University of California (J.J.D.), Davis, California.
• J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Sep 1; 83 (3): 373-380.

BackgroundUp to 40% of combat casualties with a truncal injury die of massive hemorrhage before reaching a surgeon. This hemorrhage can be prevented with damage control resuscitation (DCR) methods, which are focused on replacing shed whole blood by empirically transfusing blood components in a 1:1:1:1 ratio of platelets:fresh frozen plasma:erythrocytes:cryoprecipitate (PLT:FFP:RBC:CRYO). Measurement of hemostatic function with rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may allow optimization of the type and quantity of blood products transfused. Our hypothesis was that incorporating ROTEM measurements into DCR methods at the US Role 3 hospital at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan would change the standard transfusion ratios of 1:1:1:1 to a product mix tailored specifically for the combat causality.MethodsThis retrospective study collected data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry to compare transfusion practices and outcomes before and after ROTEM deployment to Bagram Airfield. Over the course of six months, 134 trauma patients received a transfusion (pre-ROTEM) and 85 received a transfusion and underwent ROTEM testing (post-ROTEM). Trauma teams received instruction on ROTEM use and interpretation, with no provision of a specific transfusion protocol, to supplement their clinical judgment and practice.ResultsThe pre and post groups were not significantly different in terms of mortality, massive transfusion protocol activation, mean injury severity score, or coagulation measurements. Despite the difference in size, each group received an equal total number of transfusions. However, the post-ROTEM group received a significant increase in PLT and CRYO transfusions ratios, 4× and 2×, respectively.ConclusionThe introduction of ROTEM significantly improved adherence to DCR practices. The transfusion differences suggest that aggressive DCR without thromboelastometry data may result in reduced hemostatic support and underestimate the need for PLT and CRYO. Thus, future controlled trials should include ROTEM-guided coagulation management in trauma resuscitation.Level Of EvidenceTherapeutic, level IV.

23 keywords...

hide…