• Elise Willems, Annick Smismans, Reinoud Cartuyvels, Guy Coppens, Kristien Van Vaerenbergh, Anne-Marie Van den Abeele, Johan Frans, and Bilulu Study Group.
• Department of Clinical Microbiology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium. elisekewillems@hotmail.com
• Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012 May 1; 73 (1): 1-8.

AbstractBloodstream infections remain a major challenge in medicine. Optimal detection of pathogens is only possible if the quality of preanalytical factors is thoroughly controlled. Since the laboratory is responsible for this preanalytical phase, the quality control of critical factors should be integrated in its quality control program. The numerous recommendations regarding blood culture collection contain controversies. Only an unambiguous guideline permits standardization and interlaboratory quality control. We present an evidence-based concise guideline of critical preanalytical determinants for blood culture collection and summarize key performance indicators with their concomitant target values. In an attempt to benchmark, we compared the true-positive rate, contamination rate, and collected blood volume of blood culture bottles in 5 Belgian hospital laboratories. The true-positive blood culture rate fell within previously defined acceptation criteria by Baron et al. (2005) in all 5 hospitals, whereas the contamination rate exceeded the target value in 4 locations. Most unexpected, in each of the 5 laboratories, more than one third of the blood culture bottles were incorrectly filled, irrespective of the manufacturer of the blood culture vials. As a consequence of this shortcoming, one manufacturer recently developed an automatic blood volume monitoring system. In conclusion, clear recommendations for standardized blood culture collection combined with quality control of critical factors of the preanalytical phase are essential for diagnostic blood culture improvement.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…