• J H Calhoun, F Li, W L Bauford, T Lehman, B R Ledbetter, and R Lowery.
• Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
• Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1992 Jan 1; 52 (1): 21-6.

AbstractThe success of the Ilizarov technique is due to the combination of the biomechanics of its external fixator and the biology of distraction osteogenesis. The stability and stiffness of the conventional Ilizarov fixator is attributed to its use of a K-wire cross structure. The disadvantages of this structure include pain, and possible neurologic and vascular injuries when the wires are introduced into crucial neurovascular areas, as well as increased frame complexity and construction. Reducing the number of wires decreases these problems, but also decreases the stiffness of the system. Hybrid (wire and half-pins) Ilizarov fixators and half-pin fixators are also being used in an attempt to alleviate these problems. Half-pins have been described by Fleming et al. and Green as causing minimal transfixation of the surrounding soft tissues and capable of and being inserted into anatomically safe areas. The stiffnesses of the hybrid systems have not been measured. This study reports on the stiffness of different wire and half-pin systems that were biomechanically tested in axial loading, anterior-posterior bending, medial-lateral bending, and torsional loading. The results demonstrated that the conventional Ilizarov fixator with wires possesses a high axial stiffness, whereas the fixator with half-pins possesses higher stiffness under bending and torsional loads. To obtain adequate stability, the use of hybrid Ilizarov frames with one wire and two or more half-pins (5 or 6 mm in diameter), or larger half-pin frames (5 or 6 mm) with three pins is recommended.

12 keywords...

hide…