• Q Q Tan, X Liao, C J Lan, J Lin, and J Tian.
• Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China.
• Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 11; 55 (7): 522-530.

AbstractObjective: To systematically compare the effects of Toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and corneal incisional procedures on the correction of astigmatism during cataract surgery. Methods: A peer-reviewed literature search was implemented in MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, Trip Database, Ovid, and the Chinese databases including CNKI and Wanfang Data. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the Toric IOL implantation and the corneal incisional procedures to correct low and moderate astigmatism during cataract surgery. The mean difference (MD) and the relative risk were respectively used to describe the effect sizes of continuous data and nominal data with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. The random effects model was applied to pool the data including postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, residual astigmatism and surgical complications by Review Manager 5.3. Results: A total of 12 RCTs were included in this study, including 330 eyes implanted with Toric IOLs and 336 eyes with non-Toric IOLs combined with corneal incisional procedures to correct astigmatism. According to the types of corneal incisions, the included RCTs were divided into three groups: limbal relaxing incision group, opposite clear corneal incision group, and astigmatic keratotomy group. Meta-analysis showed that postoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in eyes implanted with Toric IOLs than those with corneal incisional procedures (MD, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.02; P<0.01), and the residual astigmatism was significantly lower in eyes implanted with Toric IOLs (MD, -0.33 D; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.18 D; P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the risk of surgical complications between the Toric IOL implantation and the corneal incision correction for astigmatism (relative risk, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.07 to 2.95; P=0.40). Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that Toric IOL implantation is more effective in correcting astigmatism than corneal incisional procedures during cataract surgery and shows better postoperative visual acuity. However, they are similar in the risk of postoperative complications. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2019, 55: 522-530).

12 keywords...

hide…