• Binocul Vis Strabismus Q · Jan 2002

    Comparative Study

    Evaluation of surgical intervention in familial isolated simple ectopia lentis: younger v. older generations.

    • J A Galvin, John D Baker, Erawati V Bawle, and J A Glavin.
    • Wayne State University School of Medicine, USA.
    • Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2002 Jan 1; 17 (3): 229-34.

    BackgroundThere continues to be a debate whether surgical management of ectopia lentis in children is an appropriate course to improve visual acuity and prevent further amblyopia over medical and optical management. The long term outcome and postoperative status of three generations of patients in a single family with simple ectopia lentis is presented.SubjectsNine family members (ages 6-61 years) were evaluated at Children's Hospital of Michigan (CHM) (6 patients) and Kresge Eye Institute (KEI) (3 patients) for primary or secondary visual acuity problems and a family history of simple bilateral ectopia lentis without any systemic manifestations.ResultsThree of the four children with ectopia lentis had improved postoperative vision OU and one child was moderately amblyopic following lensectomy with 6 years followup. Of the older generation, one of the three adults had removal of dislocated lenses, with 20/50 amblyopia in one eye and 20/25 vision in the other. The other two adults were treated for end stage glaucoma with poor visual acuity.ConclusionsFor the younger generations of this family, surgical intervention for simple ectopia lentis provided improvement in visual acuity. Without surgery, amblyopia may have occurred in one or both eyes. For the oldest generation of this family, glaucoma and poor vision was the end result. Hopefully, the earlier treatment of the ectopia lentis in these children will result in better vision now and in the long term.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…