• Keyur B Shah, Sampath Gunda, Sitaramesh Emani, Manreet K Kanwar, Nir Uriel, Paolo C Colombo, Patricia A Uber, Melissa L Sears, Joyce Chuang, David J Farrar, Donald F Brophy, and George B Smallfield.
• From The Pauley Heart Center (K.B.S., S.G., P.A.U., M.L.S.), Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Research (D.F.B.), and Division of Gastroenterology (G.B.S.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus (S.E.); McGinnis Cardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (M.K.K.); Division of Cardiology, University of Chicago, IL (N.U.); Division of Cardiology, Columbia University, New York, NY (P.C.C.); and Abbott, Pleasanton, CA (J.C., D.J.F.). keyur.shah@vcuhealth.org.
• Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Nov 1; 10 (11).

BackgroundGastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is one of the most common complications after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. More than one third of patients with incident bleed go on to develop recurrent GI bleeding. Octreotide, a somatostatin analog, is proposed to reduce the risk of recurrent GI bleeding in this population.Methods And ResultsThis multicenter, retrospective analysis evaluated 51 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients who received secondary prophylaxis with octreotide after their index GI bleed from 2009 to 2015. All patients had a hospitalization for GI bleed and received octreotide after discharge. Patient demographics, medical and medication history, and clinical characteristics of patients who rebled after receiving octreotide were compared with non-rebleeders. These data were also compared with matched historical control patients previously enrolled in the HMII (HeartMate II) clinical trials, none of whom received octreotide, to provide a context for the bleeding rates. Twelve patients (24%) who received secondary octreotide prophylaxis developed another GI bleed, whereas 39 (76%) did not. There were similar intergroup demographics; however, significantly more bleeders had a previous GI bleeding history before left ventricular assist device placement (33% versus 5%; P=0.02) and greater frequency of angiodysplasia confirmed during endoscopy (58% versus 23%; P=0.03). Fewer patients in this study experienced a recurrent GI bleed compared with a matched historical control group that did not receive octreotide (24% versus 43%; P=0.04).ConclusionsPatients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device receiving secondary prophylaxis with octreotide had a significantly lower GI bleed recurrence compared with historical controls not treated with octreotide. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these data.© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

35 keywords...

hide…