• Vittal Hejjaji, Ali O Malik, Poghni A Peri-Okonny, Merrill Thomas, Yuanyuan Tang, David Wooldridge, John A Spertus, and Paul S Chan.
• Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
• JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 19; 8 (5): e15762.

BackgroundEffective and timely delivery of cardiac arrest interventions during in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation is associated with greater survival. Whether a mobile app that provides timely reminders of critical interventions improves adherence to Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) guidelines among house officers, who may lack experience in leading resuscitations, remains unknown.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of a commercially available, dynamic mobile app on house officers' adherence to ACLS guidelines.MethodsAs part of a quality improvement initiative, internal medicine house officers were invited to participate and randomized to lead 2 consecutive cardiac arrest simulations, one with a novel mobile app and one without a novel mobile app. All simulations included 4 cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with different cardiac arrest rhythms and were video recorded. The coprimary end points were chest compression fraction and number of correct interventions in each simulation. The secondary end point was incorrect interventions, defined as interventions not indicated by the 2015 ACLS guidelines. Paired t tests compared performance with and without the mobile app.ResultsAmong 53 house officers, 26 house officers were randomized to lead the first simulation with the mobile app, and 27 house officers were randomized to do so without the app. Use of the mobile app was associated with a higher number of correct ACLS interventions (out of 7; mean 6.2 vs 5.1; absolute difference 1.1 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.6]; P<.001) as well as fewer incorrect ACLS interventions (mean 0.3 vs 1.0; absolute difference -0.7 [95% CI -0.3 to -1.0]; P<.001). Simulations with the mobile app also had a marginally higher chest compression fraction (mean 90.9% vs 89.0%; absolute difference 1.9% [95% CI 0.6% to 3.4%]; P=.007).ConclusionsThis proof-of-concept study suggests that this novel mobile app may improve adherence to ACLS protocols, but its effectiveness on survival in real-world resuscitations remains unknown.©Vittal Hejjaji, Ali O Malik, Poghni A Peri-Okonny, Merrill Thomas, Yuanyuan Tang, David Wooldridge, John A Spertus, Paul S Chan. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 19.05.2020.

12 keywords...

hide…