-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents?
- G L Noel, J E Herbers, M P Caplow, G S Cooper, L N Pangaro, and J Harvey.
- Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH.
- Ann. Intern. Med. 1992 Nov 1; 117 (9): 757-65.
ObjectiveTo determine the accuracy of faculty evaluations of residents' clinical skills and whether a structured form and instructional videotape improve accuracy.DesignRandomized, controlled trial.SettingTwelve university and community teaching hospitals.ParticipantsA total of 203 faculty internists.InterventionsParticipants watched a videotape of one of two residents performing new patient workups. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: They used either an open-ended evaluation form or a structured form that prompted detailed observations; some participants used the structured form after seeing a videotape showing good evaluation techniques.Main Outcome MeasuresFaculty observations of strengths and weaknesses in the residents' performance were scored. An accuracy score consisting of clinical skills of critical importance for a competent history and physical examination was calculated for each participant by raters blinded to the participants' hospital, training, subspecialty, and experience as observers.ResultsWhen observations were not prompted, participants recorded only 30% of the residents' strengths and weaknesses; accuracy among participants using structured forms increased to 60% or greater. Faculty in university hospitals were more accurate than those in community hospitals, and general internists were more accurate than subspecialists; the structured form improved performance in all groups. However, participants disagreed markedly about the residents' overall clinical competence: Thirty-one percent assessed one resident's clinical skills as unsatisfactory or marginal, whereas 69% assessed them as satisfactory or superior; 48% assessed the other resident's clinical skills as unsatisfactory or marginal, whereas 52% assessed them as satisfactory or superior. Participants also disagreed about the residents' humanistic qualities. The instructional videotape did not improve accuracy.ConclusionsA structured form improved the accuracy of observations of clinical skills, but faculty still disagreed in their assessments of clinical competence. If program directors are to certify residents' clinical competence, better and more standardized evaluation is needed.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.