• Physiotherapy · Jun 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Impact of hypertonic saline nebulisation combined with oscillatory positive expiratory pressure on sputum expectoration and related symptoms in cystic fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial.

    • Marta San Miguel-Pagola, Gregory Reychler, María A Cebrià I Iranzo, Marta Gómez-Romero, Fernando Díaz-Gutiérrez, and Beatriz Herrero-Cortina.
    • Universidad San Jorge, Autovía Mudéjar, km. 299, Villanueva de Gállego, 50830, Zaragoza, Spain; Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pneumologie, ORL and Dermatologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: msanmiguelpagola@gmail.com.
    • Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun 1; 107: 243-251.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of combining nebulised hyaluronic acid plus hypertonic saline (HA+HS) with oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (oscillatory-PEP) on sputum expectoration and related symptoms in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF).DesignRandomised crossover trial.SettingSeven centres.ParticipantsTwenty-two outpatients with CF.InterventionsUsual care (HA+HS followed by autogenic drainage) and combined therapy (HA+HS with oscillatory-PEP followed by autogenic drainage]. Each treatment was performed for 5 days.Main Outcome MeasuresSputum expectoration was measured during the nebulisation period (primary outcome), during autogenic drainage and for 24hours post intervention. The Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q) and its domains (cough symptoms, cough impact, sputum symptoms and sputum impact), the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and lung function tests were used. Tolerance and patient preference were registered.ResultsTwenty-two participants [mean age 25 (standard deviation 8) years, percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1second 67 (22)] were recruited. Combined therapy promoted greater sputum expectoration than usual care during the nebulisation period {median difference 1.8ml [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-6.2]}. Both treatments led to similar expectoration during autogenic drainage and for 24hours post intervention. Combined therapy led to a greater improvement in the sputum symptoms domain [6.7 points (95% CI 3.3-13.3] and total CASA-Q score [2.4 points (95% CI 0.1-9.3)] compared with usual care. No differences in LCQ score or lung function were observed. Fewer adverse events were reported using combined therapy, which was selected as the preferred intervention.ConclusionsCombined nebulisation increased immediate sputum expectoration, improved sputum symptoms and reduced adverse events compared with usual care in patients with CF.Clinical Trial NumberNCT02303808.Copyright © 2019 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…