• Annals of surgery · Jun 2015

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic and Open Nissen Fundoplication in Children.

    • Thomas J Fyhn, Charlotte K Knatten, Bjørn Edwin, Ole Schistad, Lars Aabakken, Heidi Kjosbakken, Are H Pripp, Ragnhild Emblem, and Kristin Bjørnland.
    • *Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway †Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway ‡Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway §Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Norway ¶Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway ‖Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway **Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
    • Ann. Surg. 2015 Jun 1; 261 (6): 1061-7.

    ObjectiveThe aim was to compare recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children randomized to laparoscopic (LF) or open Nissen fundoplication (OF).BackgroundLF is considered superior to OF by most pediatric surgeons even though this has not been shown in any randomized controlled trial in children.MethodsPatients referred for fundoplication between 2003 and 2009 were eligible for inclusion in this 2-center, unstratified, randomized, parallel-group study conducted in Norway. The main outcome measure was recurrence of GERD, which was defined as GERD combined with a reflux index greater than 4 on pH monitoring and/or gastroesophageal reflux and/or herniated wrap on upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast study. Only experienced laparoscopic surgeons performed the LF. Postoperative follow-up included 24-hour pH monitoring, UGI contrast study, and a clinical examination at 6 months and phone interviews after 1, 2, and 4 years.ResultsEighty-seven children were included and randomized to either LF (n = 44) or OF (n = 43). Median age was 4.7 years (0.2-15.4) in the LF group and 3.7 years (0.2-14.2) in the OF group. Twenty-three patients in both groups were neurologically impaired. Median follow-up time was 4.0 years (0.3-8.9). Significantly more patients undergoing LF (37%) experienced recurrence of GERD compared to those undergoing OF (7%); risk ratio for recurrence in the LF group was 5.2 (95% confidence interval: 1.6-16.6) (P = 0.001).ConclusionsChildren operated with LF have a higher recurrence rate of GERD than those operated with OF.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…