• Hiroaki Takahashi, Yoshihiro Oshima, Masahiro Yoshida, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Kenji Okada, and Yutaka Okita.
• Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. takahashi-cvs@hotmail.co.jp
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008 Aug 1; 136 (2): 329-34.

ObjectivesSinus node dysfunction is known as a major complication after repair of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. We retrospectively analyzed the results of the atrial wall flap technique compared with the results of patch repair or direct suturing in the intra-atrial tunnel technique.MethodsBetween 1991 and 2007, 23 patients (mean age, 6 years; range, 5 months-17 years) with partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection underwent surgical intervention. The right anomalous pulmonary veins drained to either the right atrium or superior vena cava in 8 and 15 patients, respectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group F (n = 14), who had repair with an atrial flap, and group N (n = 9), who had repair without an atrial flap. All patients had normal sinus rhythm preoperatively.ResultsNo patients had signs of superior vena cava or pulmonary venous obstruction within a mean follow-up of 4.8 years. One patient in group F required pacemaker implantation. In the early postoperative period, sinus node dysfunction developed in 93% of group F and 44% of group N patients (P < .01) and was prolonged until discharge in 57% of group F and 0% of group N patients (P < .01). At the most recent clinical visit, sinus node dysfunction was identified in 50% of group F patients, whereas all patients in group N had normal sinus rhythm (P < .02).ConclusionsThe atrial flap technique, which requires incision or suture crossing the crista terminalis, could cause sinus node dysfunction, whereas the intra-atrial rerouting method with a patch or direct suture maintains normal sinus node function postoperatively.

28 keywords...

hide…