• D Roulin, A Donadini, S Gander, A-C Griesser, C Blanc, M Hübner, M Schäfer, and N Demartines.
• Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
• Br J Surg. 2013 Jul 1; 100 (8): 1108-14.

BackgroundEnhanced recovery protocols may reduce postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. However, the implementation of these protocols requires time and financial investment. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery implementation.MethodsThe first 50 consecutive patients treated during implementation of an enhanced recovery programme were compared with 50 consecutive patients treated in the year before its introduction. The enhanced recovery protocol principally implemented preoperative counselling, reduced preoperative fasting, preoperative carbohydrate loading, avoidance of premedication, optimized fluid balance, standardized postoperative analgesia, use of a no-drain policy, as well as early nutrition and mobilization. Length of stay, readmissions and complications within 30 days were compared. A cost-minimization analysis was performed.ResultsHospital stay was significantly shorter in the enhanced recovery group: median 7 (interquartile range 5-12) versus 10 (7-18) days (P = 0·003); two patients were readmitted in each group. The rate of severe complications was lower in the enhanced recovery group (12 versus 20 per cent), but there was no difference in overall morbidity. The mean saving per patient in the enhanced recovery group was €1651.ConclusionEnhanced recovery is cost-effective, with savings evident even in the initial implementation period.© 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

26 keywords...

hide…