• Pediatric emergency care · Apr 2000

    Comparative Study

    A comparison of the initial to the later stream urine in children catheterized to evaluate for a urinary tract infection.

    • P S Dayan, J M Chamberlain, D Boenning, T Adirim, J A Schor, and B L Klein.
    • Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
    • Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000 Apr 1; 16 (2): 88-90.

    BackgroundTo avoid potential contamination, it is recommended that the first few drops of urine be discarded when obtaining a catheterized urine sample from a child being evaluated for a urinary tract infection (UTI). The existing evidence to make such a recommendation is scant. Our goal, therefore, was to determine whether the urinalysis, Gram stain, and culture results were significantly different from the initial and later urine samples collected from catheterized children.MethodsA prospective diagnostic discrimination between early and later urine samples was conducted on a convenience sample of pediatric patients being evaluated for a UTI in an urban emergency department. Results of the urinalysis, Gram stain, and quantitative culture were compared between the early and later stream urine samples.ResultsData from 86 children were analyzed. Four of 80 patients had a false identification of low colony count bacteruria from the early but not from the later stream. For patients with negative cultures, the early stream was also more likely to falsely identify > or =5 wbc/hpf (P<0.01) or bacteruria (P<0.05) on urinalysis than the later stream.ConclusionsThere is a small but potentially meaningful contamination of the early stream urine compared with the later stream in young children catheterized to evaluate for a urinary tract infection.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.