-
J Minim Invasive Gynecol · Feb 2017
Randomized Controlled TrialWound Infiltration With Extended-Release Versus Short-Acting Bupivacaine Before Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Kenneth I Barron, Georgine M Lamvu, R Cole Schmidt, Matthew Fisk, Emily Blanton, and Insiyyah Patanwala.
- Division of Advanced and Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virgnia. Electronic address: kenneth.barron.md@gmail.com.
- J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb 1; 24 (2): 286-292.
Study ObjectiveTo evaluate if preincision infiltration with extended-release liposomal bupivacaine provides improved overall pain relief compared with 0.25% bupivacaine after laparoscopic or robotic-assisted hysterectomy.DesignA single-center double-masked randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force Classification I).SettingA tertiary-care community hospital.PatientsPatients recruited from July 2015 through January 2016. Sixty-four patients were randomized, and 59 were analyzed for the primary outcome.InterventionsWomen scheduled to undergo multiport laparoscopic or robotic-assisted total hysterectomy for benign indications were randomized to receive preincision infiltration with undiluted liposomal bupivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine.Measurements And Main ResultsThe primary outcome was overall average pain intensity by numeric rating scale (0-10) using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) via telephone survey on postoperative day (POD) 3. A sample size of 28 per group (N = 56) was planned to detect a 30% change in pain scores. Secondary outcomes were overall average and worst numeric pain scores on PODs 1, 2, and 14; pain scores in hospital; BPI pain interference scores; and total opioid use. There were no demographic differences between the 2 groups. For the primary outcome, we found a decrease in the average (p = .02) pain scores on POD 3 in the liposomal bupivacaine group. We also found a decrease in worst pain scores on POD 2 (p = .03) and POD 3 (p = .01). There were no differences in pain scores while in the hospital or on POD 1 or POD 14. There were no differences in BPI pain interference scores, opioid use, or reported adverse effects.ConclusionFor laparoscopic and robotic-assisted multiport hysterectomies, there is evidence of decreased average postoperative pain with liposomal bupivacaine compared with 0.25% bupivacaine for port-site analgesia on POD 3, but no difference in opioid use or measures of functioning.Published by Elsevier Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.