• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Aug 1999

    Comparative Study

    Beneficial effects of leukocyte-depleted blood and low-potassium dextran solutions on microvascular permeability in preserved porcine lung.

    • O D Schneuwly, M Licker, C M Pastor, A Schweizer, D O Slosman, Y Kapanci, L P Nicod, J Robert, A Spiliopoulos, and D R Morel.
    • Divisions of Anesthesiological Investigations, Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Pathology, and Pneumology, Unit of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
    • Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999 Aug 1; 160 (2): 689-97.

    AbstractModified Euro-Collins (EC) solution, a crystalloid intracellular-type solution, has been commonly used for pulmonary preservation. Several experimental studies have shown the advantages of using extracellular colloid-based solutions. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of preservation of two extracellular colloid solutions, leukocyte-depleted blood (BL) and low-potassium dextran (LPD) solutions, with that of EC solution. Lungs of 22 domestic pigs were flushed and preserved with EC (n = 8), BL (n = 7), or LPD (n = 7) solution. After harvesting, one of the lungs was reperfused immediately in an ex vivo circuit (control lungs), whereas the contralateral lung was reperfused after 8 h of cold (4 degrees C) storage (preserved lungs). Besides the lung function parameters (gas exchange, pulmonary hemodynamics and mechanics), the permeability of the endothelial-epithelial barrier was assessed by determining the transferrin leak index (TLI) using a double radioisotopic method, by measuring the alveolar/arterial protein concentration ratio, and by analyzing histopathologic changes. The functional quality (oxygenation, airway resistance, dynamic compliance [CL, dyn]) of both BL and LPD lungs was slightly but significantly superior to that of EC lungs. However, pulmonary vascular resistance was lower in BL-preserved than in EC- or LPD-preserved lungs. The TLI was increased in EC control and preserved lungs, whereas it was low in BL and LPD control lungs and did not increase after preservation. The alveolar/arterial protein concentration ratio was not different between control groups, but was increased fourfold in EC-preserved compared with BL- or LPD-preserved lungs. Finally, EC-preserved lungs presented a weight gain about twice that of BL- and LPD-preserved lungs. Morphologic analysis confirmed these results, because in the EC-preserved lungs, rupture of alveolar septa and severe alveolar edema and hemorrhage were observed, whereas BL- and LPD-preserved lungs showed a relatively well-preserved structure. The results demonstrate that both BL and LPD flush solutions preserve the endothelial-epithelial barrier better than does EC solution. Although the quality of preservation is similar, pulmonary vascular resistance is higher in LPD-preserved than in BL-preserved lungs.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.