• Annals of surgery · Dec 2014

    The optimum excision margin and regional node management for primary cutaneous T3 melanomas (2-4 mm in Thickness): a retrospective study of 1587 patients treated at a single center.

    • Lieke G E Lamboo, Lauren E Haydu, Richard A Scolyer, Michael J Quinn, Robyn P M Saw, Kerwin F Shannon, Andrew J Spillane, Jonathan R Stretch, Johannes J Bonenkamp, and John F Thompson.
    • *Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands †Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Disciplines of ‡Surgery, and §Pathology, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and ¶Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
    • Ann. Surg.. 2014 Dec 1;260(6):1095-102.

    ObjectiveTo determine the optimum excision margin and nodal management for patients with primary cutaneous melanomas 2.01- to 4.00-mm thick (T3 melanomas).BackgroundCurrently available evidence does not reliably define the minimum safe excision margin and best nodal management for patients with primary cutaneous T3 melanomas.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted, analyzing data on 1587 patients with melanomas 2.01- to 4.00-mm thick treated at a single center.ResultsA histopathologic excision margin of 8 mm or more (equivalent to a ≥1 cm surgical margin) was associated with increased local and in-transit recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.54; P = 0.008] and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.59; P = 0.001) compared with a less than 8-mm margin. The <8-mm group had reduced distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) compared with the 8- to 16-mm group (HR = 1.63; P = 0.038). On multivariate analysis, patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) had significantly reduced melanoma-specific survival (MSS), DFS, regional node recurrence-free survival (RNRFS) and DRFS compared with patients with a negative SLN, unless an immediate completion lymph node dissection was performed. Patients in whom an SLN biopsy was not performed had significantly reduced MSS (HR = 2.10; P < 0.001), DFS (P < 0.001), RNRFS (P < 0.001), and DRFS (P = 0.010) compared with patients who received an SLN biopsy.ConclusionsA histopathologic excision margin of 8 mm or more (corresponding to a ≥1 cm surgical excision margin) combined with SLN biopsy (followed by an immediate completion lymph node dissection if positive) provided T3 melanoma patients with optimum local, regional, and distant disease control and resulted in enhanced melanoma-specific survival.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…