-
Diagn Interv Imaging · Sep 2017
ReviewAugmented osteoplasty for proximal femur consolidation in cancer patients: Biomechanical considerations and techniques.
- F H Cornelis and F Deschamps.
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France. Electronic address: cornelisfrancois@gmail.com.
- Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Sep 1; 98 (9): 645-650.
AbstractAccording to the literature, prophylactic consolidation of lytic metastasis located in the proximal femur is recommended when the Mirels' score is above 8. Osteoplasty alone provides inadequate consolidation but various devices have been used in association for better consolidation. The aim of this review is to detail the augmented osteoplasty techniques published in the literature and to report their safeties and their efficacies to prevent pathological fracture of the proximal femur. A Pubmed research found 5 studies that evaluated augmented osteoplasty of the proximal femur in cancer patients. All devices demonstrate adequate safety and low rate of secondary pathological fractures.Copyright © 2017 Editions françaises de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..