• J. Am. Coll. Surg. · Apr 2014

    Long-term results of phase II ablation after breast lumpectomy added to extend intraoperative margins (ABLATE l) trial.

    • V Suzanne Klimberg, Daniela Ochoa, Ronda Henry-Tillman, Matthew Hardee, Cristiano Boneti, Laura L Adkins, Maureen McCarthy, Evan Tummel, Jeannette Lee, Sharp Malak, Issam Makhoul, and Soheila Korourian.
    • Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR; Arkansas Breast Cancer Research Program (ABCRP), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR; Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR. Electronic address: klimbergsuzanne@uams.edu.
    • J. Am. Coll. Surg.. 2014 Apr 1;218(4):741-9.

    BackgroundExcision followed by radiofrequency ablation (eRFA) is an intraoperative method that uses intracavitary hyperthermia to create an additional tumor-free zone around the lumpectomy cavity in breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that eRFA after lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer could reduce the need for re-excision for close margins as well as potentially maintain local control without the need for radiation.Study DesignThis prospective phase II institutional review board-approved study was conducted from March 2004 to April 2010. A standard lumpectomy was performed, then the RFA probe was deployed 1 cm circumferentially into the walls of the lumpectomy cavity and maintained at 100 °C for 15 minutes. Validated Doppler sonography was used to intraoperatively determine adequacy of ablation.ResultsOne hundred patients were accrued to the trial, with an average age of 65.02 years ± 10.0 years. The stages were Tis (n = 30); T1mic (n = 1); T1a (n = 9); T1b (n = 27); T1c (n = 22); T2 (n = 10) ; and T3 (n = 1). Grades were I (n = 48); II (n = 29); and III (n = 23). Seventy-eight subjects had margins >2 mm (negative), 22 patients had margins ≤ 2 mm, of which 12 were close and 3 focally positive, which, at our institution, would have required re-excision (only 1 patient in this group had re-excision). There were 6% postoperative complications, and 24 patients received radiation therapy (XRT). During the study mean follow-up period of 62 months ± 24 months (68-month median follow-up) in patients not treated with XRT, there were 2 in-site tumor recurrences treated with aromitase inhibitor, 3 biopsy entrance site recurrences treated with excision and XRT to conserve the breast, and 2 recurrences elsewhere and 1 contralateral recurrence; all 3 treated with mastectomy.ConclusionsLong-term follow-up suggests that eRFA may reduce the need for re-excision for close or focally positive margins in breast cancer patients, and eRFA may be a valuable tool for treating favorable patients who desire lumpectomy and either cannot or do not want radiation. A multicenter trial has been initiated based on these results.Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…