• Annals of surgery · May 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug repair for inguinal hernia.

    • Raoul A Droeser, Salome Dell-Kuster, Anita Kurmann, Rachel Rosenthal, Markus Zuber, Jürg Metzger, Daniel Oertli, Christian T Hamel, and Daniel M Frey.
    • *Division of General and Visceral Surgery and †Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland ‡Division of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland §Division of Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland ¶Division of Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland ‖Division of Visceral Surgery, Kreiskrankenhaus Lörrach, Lörrach, Germany **Division of General Surgery, Gesundheitszentrum Wetzikon, Wetzikon, Switzerland.
    • Ann. Surg.. 2014 May 1;259(5):966-72.

    ObjectiveTo compare long-term results of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug repair for open inguinal hernia repair.BackgroundThe technique of best choice in open prosthetic inguinal hernia repair remains a subject of ongoing debate.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized controlled multicenter trial, patients with primary or recurrent inguinal hernias were randomized to undergo either Lichtenstein's operation or mesh plug repair. The primary endpoint was the long-term recurrence rate. Secondary endpoints included chronic pain, sensibility disorders, and reoperation rate.ResultsIn total, 697 hernias in 594 patients were randomized (297 patients per group). At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 528 (76%) operated hernias in 444 (75%) patients were clinically evaluated. The recurrence rate was similar in both groups [mesh plug: 21/268 hernias = 7.8%; Lichtenstein: 21/260 hernias = 8.1%; adjusted odds ratio (OR): 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51, 1.68; P = 0.795]. We did not find a significant difference for chronic pain (Visual Analog Scale score >3) (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.31, 1.09; P = 0.088) and sensory testing (17% vs 20% of patients; OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.21, 1.37; P = 0.190) between the 2 groups. There were less reoperations in the mesh plug than in the Lichtenstein's operation group (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.85; P = 0.016).ConclusionsThe long-term results of this trial indicate not enough evidence for differences in recurrence, chronic pain, and sensibility disorders between mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein's operation but a lower likelihood for reoperation for mesh plug repair. Estimates for all endpoints were statistically not significant or based on large CIs.Clinical Trials RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01637818.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.