-
Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. · Jul 2020
Managing Esketamine Treatment Frequency Toward Successful Outcomes: Analysis of Phase 3 Data.
- Michel Nijs, Ewa Wajs, Leah Aluisio, Ibrahim Turkoz, Ella Daly, Adam Janik, Stephane Borentain, Jaskaran B Singh, Allitia DiBernardo, and Frank Wiegand.
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Department of Global Analytics - Neuroscience, Titusville.
- Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Jul 29; 23 (7): 426-433.
BackgroundEsketamine nasal spray was recently approved for treatment-resistant depression. The current analysis evaluated the impact of symptom-based treatment frequency changes during esketamine treatment on clinical outcomes.MethodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of an open-label, long-term (up to 1 year) study of esketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression (SUSTAIN 2). During a 4-week induction phase, 778 patients self-administered esketamine twice weekly plus a new oral antidepressant daily. In responders (≥50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score from baseline), esketamine treatment frequency was thereafter decreased during an optimization/maintenance phase to weekly for 4 weeks and then adjusted to the lowest frequency (weekly or every other week) that maintained remission (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ≤ 12) based on a study-defined algorithm. The relationship between treatment frequency and symptom response, based on clinically meaningful change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, was subsequently evaluated 4 weeks after treatment frequency adjustments in the optimization/maintenance phase.ResultsAmong 580 responders treated with weekly esketamine for the first 4 weeks in the optimization/maintenance phase (per protocol), 26% continued to improve, 50% maintained clinical benefit, and 24% worsened. Thereafter, when treatment frequency could be reduced from weekly to every other week, 19% further improved, 49% maintained benefit, and 32% worsened. For patients no longer in remission after treatment frequency reduction, an increase (every other week to weekly) resulted in 47% improved, 43% remained unchanged, and 10% worsened.ConclusionsThese findings support individualization of esketamine nasal spray treatment frequency to optimize treatment response in real-world clinical practice.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02497287.© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.