• Med. J. Aust. · Jun 1992

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Nebuhaler versus wet aerosol for domiciliary bronchodilator therapy. A multi-centre clinical comparison.

    • R J Pierce, C F McDonald, L I Landau, P N Le Souef, J G Armstrong, C A Mitchell, P W Francis, A J Martin, A W Musk, and R Antic.
    • Repatriation General Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic.
    • Med. J. Aust. 1992 Jun 1; 156 (11): 771-4.

    ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effectiveness and patient acceptance of a large spacer device (Nebuhaler) for delivery of metered dose aerosol (MDI) terbutaline with nebulised wet aerosol terbutaline.DesignRandomised open crossover study over two sequential four week treatment periods, following a two week run-in.SettingMulti-centre including five adult thoracic units and three paediatric centres throughout Australia.PatientsThirty-eight adults and 23 children with clinical asthma and reversible airflow obstruction (increase in forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] of greater than or equal to 15% in response to inhaled bronchodilator) entered the study proper. Six adults and one child withdrew.InterventionsTerbutaline was administered four times daily via Nebuhaler/MDI or nebuliser. Clinical assessment with spirometry and peak flow readings was made after run-in and at the end of each treatment period. Patients recorded on diary cards daily peak expiratory flow rates and symptom scores and comparisons of these results for each treatment period were made. At the completion of the study patients answered a treatment preference questionnaire.ResultsNo differences were found between the two treatment periods in diary card peak flow recordings and symptom score data, and in clinical assessment of spirometry and peak expiratory flow rates. There were also no differences between spirometry and peak flow values recorded at the clinic at randomisation and at the end of each treatment period, suggesting stable basal airflow obstruction over the period of the study. Thirty-two per cent of adults and 52% of children preferred the Nebuhaler/MDI combination, mainly because of convenience of use. Treatment preference was not related to any measured index of lung function.ConclusionsMDI terbutaline delivered via Nebuhaler provides clinical benefit similar to that of wet aerosol terbutaline in the long-term domiciliary management of patients with stable airflow obstruction.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…