• Robert James Cerfolio, Ayesha S Bryant, and Mary T Hawn.
• Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala 35294, USA. rcerfolio@uab.edu
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.. 2013 Jan 1;145(1):90-6.

ObjectivesMinimally invasive esophagectomy with a chest anastomosis has advantages. We present technical lessons learned and early results.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.ResultsOver 10 months, 22 patients (19 men) underwent laparoscopic gastric mobilization, with robotic esophagectomy. All had the thoracic portion completed robotically and 21 had the stomach mobilized laproscopically. All had esophageal cancer and 20 received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. All had R0 resection with a median of 18 lymph nodes removed and a blood loss of 40 mL. The first 6 patients underwent a stapled posterior and hand-sewn anterior anastomosis; five of these patients experienced a major morbidity, including 1 anastomotic leak and 1 leak from the gastric staple line. The last 16 patients had a 2-layered completely hand-sewn anastomosis, and there were no anastomotic leaks or major morbidities. There were no 30- or 90-day mortalities. Technical improvements included placing a loop around the esophagus in the abdomen for third arm retraction, advancing the gastric conduit into the chest using nonrobotic instruments, using 10-cm nonabsorbable interrupted sutures for the outer layer, and a running 22-cm long absorbable suture for the inner layer.ConclusionsRobotic thoracic esophagectomy using ports only is feasible, safe, and affords R0 resection with thorough thoracic lymph node dissection. It also allows the sewing of a 2-layered chest anastomosis with good early results.Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

31 keywords...

hide…