• Chi Heon Kim, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Sung Mi Kim, and Joo-Kyung Sung.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
• Eur Spine J. 2015 Dec 1; 24 (12): 3005-12.

PurposeThe posterior cervical foraminotomy and diskectomy (PCD) is a traditional surgical technique for patients with laterally located soft-disk herniation. Recently, tubular retractor-assisted posterior foraminotomy and diskectomy (MTPF) and posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and diskectomy (P-PECD) have been introduced, but a comparative study has not yet been performed.MethodsPatients with foraminal soft-disk herniation and a follow-up period of >2 years were retrospectively reviewed; 22 patients underwent a MTPF and 22 patients underwent a P-PECD. The primary end-point was an improvement of arm pain more than 4.3. The clinical parameters (age, sex, disability index, neck and arm pain), radiological parameters (cervical curvature, segmental angle, anterior-/posterior-disk height and amount of facet joint removal) preoperatively and at postoperative month 24 and the surgical methods were considered as co-variates.ResultsSuccessful outcome was achieved in 19/22 (87%) of the patients after both MTPF and a P-PECD. Preoperative SA showed trend (P = 0.08; OR 1.2; 95% CI 0.98-1.4) and the cut-off SA was 1.45° (sensitivity 80%, specificity 73%). The length of the facet joint's removal was 0.02-2.49 mm (0.1-15.2%) with no difference between the MTPF and P-PECD. The surgical method was not a significant factor.ConclusionsFor patients with foraminal soft-disk herniation, either MTPF or P-PECD, may be regarded as an alternative options to open surgery. Preoperative kyphotic SA (cut-off value 1.45°) seemed to be associated with poor outcome and this may be considered in selecting surgical methods.

21 keywords...

hide…