• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Nov 2015

    Comparative Study

    Early surgical intervention versus watchful waiting and outcomes for asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation.

    • Christophe de Meester, Bernhard L Gerber, David Vancraeynest, Anne-Catherine Pouleur, Philippe Noirhomme, Agnès Pasquet, Gébrine El Khoury, and Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde.
    • Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2015 Nov 1; 150 (5): 1100-8.

    ObjectivesThe management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation remains controversial. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to assess the long-term outcomes and incidence of cardiac complications among asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation who underwent operation early, in the absence of any class I or class IIa guideline triggers, or were managed conservatively and eventually underwent operation whenever these triggers appeared.MethodsA total of 160 consecutive asymptomatic patients (50 ± 17 years) with severe aortic regurgitation were prospectively followed up for a median of 7.2 years. Overall and cardiovascular survivals and the need for repeat aortic regurgitation surgery were evaluated in an "early surgery" group (n = 91) and a "conservatively managed" group (n = 69).ResultsTen-year overall (91% ± 4% vs 89% ± 5%, P = .87) and cardiovascular (96% ± 2% vs 96% ± 3%, P = .79) survivals were similar among the early surgery and conservatively managed groups. Conservatively managed patients were further sub-stratified according to the regularity and quality of their follow-up. Patients who were regularly followed up by a certified cardiologist had a better 10-year overall survival than patients undergoing no or a looser follow-up (95% ± 5% vs 79% ± 10%, P = .045). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified age (P = .003) and male gender (P = .024) as independent predictors of survival. Early surgical management was not a predictor of outcome (P = .45).ConclusionsOur results show that the outcome of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation is not different between an early surgical and a more conservative strategy, provided that the conservatively managed patients are regularly followed up and timely referred to surgery as soon as operative triggers develop. This suggests that surgery should not be recommended in patients with aortic regurgitation who do not meet current guidelines for intervention.Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.