• S Ishioka, S Sagae, T Saito, T Kiya, M Sugimura, N Akutagawa, K Umemura, E Ito, and R Kudo.
• Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University.
• Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000 Apr 1; 27 (4): 593-8.

AbstractThe efficacy of an intravenous 5-HT3 antagonist (granisetron) and four oral 5-HT3 antagonists (granisetron, ondansetron, tropisetron and ramosetron) on chemotherapy-induced emesis were investigated in 21 gynecologic cancer patients (63 courses). The severity of emesis after chemotherapy was classified in 4 grades (0: none, 1: slight loss of appetite, 2: severe loss of appetite, but tolerable, and 3: untolerable). The effect of 5-HT3 antagonists was judged by both the score for the severity of the emesis and the frequency of vomiting. The four oral 5-HT3 antagonists were almost the same in efficacy for 5 days after chemotherapy. Oral 5-HT3 antagonists were almost equipotent to intravenous granisetron for JT (paclitaxel + carboplatin) therapy or T (paclitaxel) therapy for 5 days after chemotherapy. However, they were ineffective for CAP (cisplatin + adriamycin + cyclophosphamide) therapy. From these results, oral 5-HT3 antagonists were proved to have a sufficient anti emetic effect after chemotherapy in cases of JT or T therapy. However, in cases of CAP therapy, intravenous 5-HT3 antagonists were thought to be preferable for the control of emesis due to chemotherapy.

36 keywords...

hide…