• Jing Peng, Yan Hao, Bihua Rao, and Yunxia Cao.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 2; 100 (26): e26488e26488.

BackgroundThe influence of pre-treatment controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score on the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is inconclusive. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of CONUT score in NSCLC patients.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted to assess the correlation between the CONUT score and the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as the cancer-specific survival.ResultsA total of 11 studies with 3029 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled results indicated that a high CONUT score was positively correlated with poor OS (HR: 1.63, 95%CI: 1.40-1.88, P < .001) and shortened DFS/RFS (HR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.35-2.01, P < .001), but no significant relationship with the cancer-specific survival (HR: 1.28, 95%CI: 0.60-2.73, P = .517) was identified. The negative effect of high CONUT score on the OS and DFS/RFS was detected in every subgroup with varying treatment methods, cancer stage, CONUT cut-off values, sample size, and analysis methods of HR. Additionally, preoperative high CONUT score was an independent predictor of postoperative complications (odds ratio: 1.58, 95%CI: 1.21-2.06, P = .001) in NSCLC. Last but not least, high CONUT score was not significantly correlated with the patients' sex, smoking status, cancer stage, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, pleural invasion, and pathological cancer type.ConclusionThese results demonstrate that high CONUT score is positively related to poor prognoses. The CONUT score may therefore be considered as an effective prognostic marker in NSCLC patients.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

16 keywords...

hide…