• Hearing research · Aug 2000

    Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. II: comparison of model and physiological measures of membrane properties measured in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation.

    • L A Cartee.
    • Center for Auditory Prosthesis Research, Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. lianne@rti.org
    • Hear. Res. 2000 Aug 1; 146 (1-2): 153-66.

    AbstractThis study examines existing equation sets describing neural membrane ionic currents, such as the Hodgkin-Huxley (1952) equations, used to define the membrane currents in a numerical model of the auditory neuron and determines their adequacy for modeling the summation and refraction properties of auditory neurons in response to electrical stimulation. Specifically, the summation and refraction time constants of each equation set are compared to physiological measures of these time constants. Since previous studies have shown the cell body and peripheral process of the auditory neuron may influence the measurement of neural time constants, the physiological time constants used for comparison are those which were recorded using intrameatal electrical stimulation. The intrameatal electrode should stimulate the neuron in an area where the axon has a uniform geometry. Accordingly, the neural model used to duplicate this experiment was also of uniform geometry. Of the membrane equation sets evaluated, none was clearly superior for modeling both the refraction and summation properties of the auditory neuron, though some equation sets were capable of accurately modeling either the refraction or the summation properties, provided operating temperatures were adjusted to provide appropriate kinetics.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.