-
Surgical infections · Oct 2013
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyPlasma and tissue cefazolin concentrations in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery and receiving differing pre-operative doses of drug.
- Michael Stitely, Michael Sweet, Douglas Slain, Lindsy Alons, William Holls, Charles Hochberg, and Frank Briggs.
- 1 Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin School of Medicine , Dunedin, New Zealand .
- Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Oct 1; 14 (5): 455-9.
BackgroundPatients undergoing cesarean delivery typically receive a 1-g to 2-g dose of cefazolin as pre-operative antibacterial prophylaxis. This traditional dosage may not provide an adequate tissue concentration of cefazolin in obese patients during the peri-operative period. This study compared the tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin administered as a either a 2-g or a 4-g dose prior to cesarean delivery in obese patients.MethodsTwenty obese patients (first trimester body mass index [BMI] >35) who underwent cesarean delivery completed this randomized study. Eleven patients received 2 g of cefazolin, and nine received 4 g. Blood and subcutaneous tissues were collected at the times of the incision and closure. Myometrial biopsies were collected at uterine closure. A cefazolin concentration threshold of 4 mcg/g for tissue samples was used as a surrogate adequate concentration. Plasma and tissue cefazolin concentrations were compared for the two doses.ResultsMean plasma, umbilical cord, and myometrial cefazolin concentrations were significantly higher in the 4-g treatment group (p<0.05). Subcutaneous incision site tissue obtained at time of incision creation also was significantly higher in the 4-g group than in the 2-g group (40.11±24.10 mcg/g vs. 18.36±6.68 mcg/g; p=0.0005). Subcutaneous tissue concentrations at closure were significantly different in the two dosage groups (34.89±17.42 mcg/g vs. 21.73±16.02 mcg/g; p=0.044). All tissue samples were above the target of 4 mcg/g. Body morphometry did not correlate with the variability in cefazolin tissue concentration. No surgical site infections, endometritis, or other adverse effects were observed.ConclusionsAdministering a prophylactic dose of 4 g of cefazolin produced blood and tissue cefazolin concentrations that were significantly higher than concentrations obtained from a 2-g dose in patients with BMIs between 35 and 60 kg/m(2) undergoing cesarean delivery. It is unclear if the larger cefazolin dose produces a more protective anti-infective effect than that obtained with the more traditional 2-g dose for cesarean delivery in obese patients.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.