• S Ramos Linares, J Merino Alonso, N Román González, E Tévar Alfonso, P Díaz Ruíz, and M Gorchs Molist.
• Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España. sramlin@gobienodecanarias.org
• Farm Hosp. 2011 Mar 1; 35 (2): 70-4.

ObjectiveTo measure and provide an economic assessment of the preparations returned to a centralised cytostatic drug preparation unit, analyse reasons for their return, propose measures for minimising returns and assess their impact on the Medical Oncology division's outpatient services.MethodsThis prospective study contained two phases. During the first, we registered all returns, motives, cases of reuse and costs. In the second phase, we analysed returns at the Oncology outpatient division after having adopted measures to minimise the returns.ResultsDuring the first phase, 218 preparations (worth € 51,131) were returned. The Oncology Day Hospital returned 1% of the preparations worth 1% of the total value; during the second phase, these figures were 0.56% of the preparations and 0.14% of the total value.ConclusionsFavouring reporting on and identifying expensive treatments with little stability and using returned preparations as a quality indicator for Oncology has improved management of the central cystostatic preparation unit.Copyright © 2009 SEFH. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

36 keywords...

hide…