• Family practice · Sep 2018

    Identification of influencing factors and strategies to improve communication between general practitioners and community nurses: a qualitative focus group study.

    • Minke S Nieuwboer, Marieke Perry, Rob van der Sande, MaassenIrma T H MITHMRadboud Institute for Health Science, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Olde RikkertMarcel G MMGMRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud U, and Marjolein A van der Marck.
    • Radboudumc Alzheimer Centre, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
    • Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 18; 35 (5): 619-625.

    BackgroundAs the number of patients with complex healthcare needs grows, inter-professional collaboration between primary care professionals must be constantly optimized. General practitioners (GPs) and community nurses (CNs) are key professions in primary care; however, poor GP-CN communication is common, and research into the factors influencing its quality is limited.ObjectiveTo explore patient-related GP-CN communication and facilitating and hindering factors, and to identify strategies to enhance this communication.MethodA qualitative focus group design was used to identify the facilitating and hindering factors and strategies for improvement. In a Dutch primary care setting, 6 mono-professional focus group interviews (3 meetings of 13 GPs; 3 meetings of 18 CNs) were organized between June 2015 and April 2016, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two independent researchers performed the coding of these interviews, identifying their categories and themes.ResultsResults show that, despite the regular contact between GPs and CNs, communication was generally perceived as poor in effectiveness and efficiency by both professions. Mutual trust was considered the most important facilitating factor for effective communication. Profession-specific factors (e.g. differences in responsibility and profession-specific language) and organizational factors (e.g. lack of shared care plans, no in-person communication, lack of time) may be of influence on communication. Participants' suggestions for improvement included organizing well-structured and reimbursed team meetings and facilitating face-to-face contact.ConclusionGP-CN patient-related communication benefits most from trusting inter-personal relationships. Inter-professional training programmes should address both professional and organizational factors and should be evaluated for their effect on quality of care.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.