• Frederik B Thomsen, Klaus Brasso, Ib J Christensen, Jan-Erik Johansson, Anders Angelsen, Teuvo L J Tammela, Peter Iversen, and Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group.
• Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: thomsen.frederik@gmail.com.
• Eur. J. Cancer. 2015 Jul 1; 51 (10): 1283-92.

BackgroundThe optimal timing of endocrine therapy in non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is still an issue of debate.MethodsA randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial comparing bicalutamide 150mg once daily with placebo in addition to standard care in patients with hormone-naïve, non-metastatic PCa. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was performed to analyse time-to-event (death).FindingsA total of 1218 patients were included into the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group (SPCG)-6 study of which 607 were randomised to receive bicalutamide in addition to their standard care and 611 to receive placebo. Median follow-up was 14.6years. Overall, 866 (71.1%) patients died, 428 (70.5%) in the bicalutamide arm and 438 (71.7%) in the placebo arm, p=0.87. Bicalutamide significantly improved OS in patient with locally advanced disease (hazard ratios (HR)=0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.94, p=0.01), regardless of baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), with a survival benefit which was apparent throughout the study period. In contrast, survival favoured randomisation to the placebo arm in patients with localised disease (HR=1.19 (95% CI: 1.00-1.43), p=0.056). However, a survival gain from bicalutamide therapy was present in patients with localised disease and a baseline PSA greater than 28ng/mL at randomisation. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, only including patients managed on watchful waiting as their standard of care (n=991) OS depended on age, World Health Organisation (WHO) grade, baseline PSA, clinical stage and randomised treatment.InterpretationThroughout the 14.6year follow-up period the addition of early bicalutamide to standard of care resulted in a significant OS benefit in patients with locally advanced PCa. In contrast, patients with localised PCa and low PSA derived no survival benefit from early bicalutamide. The optimal timing for initiating bicalutamide in non-metastatic PCa patients is dependent on disease stage and baseline PSA.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

28 keywords...

hide…