• J Am Geriatr Soc · Feb 2014

    Comparative Study

    Quick and easy is not without cost: implications of poorly performing nutrition screening tools in hip fracture.

    • Jack J Bell, Judith D Bauer, Sandra Capra, and Ranjeev C Pulle.
    • Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Dietetic Research, School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
    • J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Feb 1; 62 (2): 237-43.

    ObjectivesTo evaluate the performance of commonly applied nutrition screening tools and measures and to consider the potential costs of undiagnosed malnutrition in a case-based reimbursement funding environment.DesignA diagnostic accuracy study to compare a variety of nutrition screening techniques against primary, secondary, and comparative measures of nutritional status.SettingPublic metropolitan hospital orthogeriatric unit.ParticipantsIndividuals with acute hip fracture admitted to the orthogeriatric unit; 150 prospective, consecutively admitted individuals were considered, with eight exclusions, yielding a sample size of 142 participants.MeasurementsScreens included the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, Malnutrition Screening Tool, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Nutrition Risk Screen 2002, anthropometric measures, and albumin. Malnutrition was diagnosed using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems, Tenth Edition, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) criteria. Healthcare coders costed malnutrition-related diagnostic related groups and cost-weight changes for individual participants.ResultsMalnutrition prevalence was 48%. Screening tools had only slight to moderate agreement with ICD-10-AM diagnosis of malnutrition, and none of the screening tools tested met the a priori requirement of 80% sensitivity and 60% specificity. The estimated cost effect of poor screening tool sensitivity on a 16-bed hip fracture unit ranged from AUS$46,506 to AUS$228,896 per year.ConclusionPoor screening tool sensitivity leads to undiagnosed malnutrition; tools that are quick and easy to apply are not without cost. Routine nutrition assessment should replace nutrition risk screening in hip fracture settings with a high prevalence of malnutrition reliant on case-mix funding. Further pragmatic studies are urgently required to determine whether findings apply to other elderly inpatient populations with endemic malnutrition, comorbidities, and cognitive impairment.© 2014, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2014, The American Geriatrics Society.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…