-
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc · Feb 2004
Comparative StudyHysteroscopically targeted biopsies compared with blind samplings in endometrial assessment of menopausal women taking tamoxifen for breast cancer.
- Giancarlo Garuti, Fulvia Cellani, Monica Colonnelli, Delia Garzia, Cristina Gonfiantini, and Massimo Luerti.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lodi Hospital, Lodi, Italy.
- J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Feb 1; 11 (1): 62-7.
Study ObjectiveTo determine the validity of tissue sampling accomplished by hysteroscopically targeted or blind biopsies in the assessment of endometrial morbidity associated with tamoxifen treatment.DesignRetrospective, unrandomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).SettingPublic hospital.PatientsOne hundred seventy-six menopausal women who had an endometrial stripe of more than 4 mm on transvaginal ultrasonography.InterventionReview of histopathologic reports of patients undergoing hysteroscopy followed by targeted (94 samplings) or blind (82 samplings) endometrial biopsies.Measurements And Main ResultsHistopathology was considered the reference test to assess endometrial morbidity, and correlates with hysteroscopic findings were made to evaluate the validity of the two sampling procedures. Overall, in 23 women (13.0%) tissue samples were insufficient for pathologic evaluation. Functional or atrophic endometrium and cystic atrophy were found in 51 (28.8%) and 37 patients (21.0%), respectively. Polyps, hyperplasias, and carcinomas were found in 38 (21.5%), 19 (10.7%), and 6 (3.3%), respectively. Blind biopsies failed to detect 5 of 5 polyps and 33 of 37 cystic atrophies, and in 34.1% of cases provided insufficient tissue for diagnosis; however, no hyperplasias or carcinomas were undetected. All specimens collected under vision were pathologically evaluable; 34 of 38 hysteroscopic reports of cystic atrophy were confirmed, and neither endometrial polyps nor hyperplasias and carcinomas were undetected. In distinguishing between normal and abnormal endometrium, hysteroscopy showed sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% regardless of sampling modality. We found better specificity (80.0% vs 68.9%) and positive predictive value (68.9% vs 43.7%) for hysteroscopic diagnosis when tissue was collected under vision compared with blind sampling.ConclusionIn women taking tamoxifen, endometrial evaluation performed by blind sampling is safe in excluding hyperplasias or carcinomas. For complete understanding of tamoxifen-associated morbidity, hysteroscopy with sampling under vision has better diagnostic compliance.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.