• Merrill R Landers, Sarrie Oscar, Jessica Sasaoka, and Kyle Vaughn.
• M.R. Landers, PT, DPT, PhD, OCS, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Pkwy, Box 453029, Las Vegas, NV (USA). merrill.landers@unlv.edu.
• Phys Ther. 2016 Apr 1; 96 (4): 433-42.

BackgroundEvidence suggests that there are several fall predictors in the elderly population, including previous fall history and balance impairment. To date, however, the role of psychological factors has not yet been thoroughly vetted in conjunction with physical factors as predictors of future falls.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine which measures, physical and psychological, are most predictive of falling in older adults.DesignThis was a prospective cohort study.MethodsSixty-four participants (mean age=72.2 years, SD=7.2; 40 women, 24 men) with and without pathology (25 healthy, 17 with Parkinson disease, 11 with cerebrovascular accident, 6 with diabetes, and 5 with a cardiovascular diagnosis) participated. Participants reported fall history and completed physical-based measures (ie, Berg Balance Scale, Dynamic Gait Index, self-selected gait speed, Timed "Up & Go" Test, Sensory Organization Test) and psychological-based measures (ie, Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire, Falls Efficacy Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale). Contact was made 1 year later to determine falls during the subsequent year (8 participants lost at follow-up).ResultsUsing multiple regression, fall history, pathology, and all measures were entered as predictor candidates. Three variables were included in the final model, explaining 49.2% of the variance: Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (38.7% of the variance), Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (5.6% additional variance), and Timed "Up & Go" Test (4.9% additional variance).LimitationsFalls were based on participant recall rather than a diary.ConclusionsBalance confidence was the best predictor of falling, followed by fear of falling avoidance behavior, and the Timed "Up & Go" Test. Fall history, presence of pathology, and physical tests did not predict falling. These findings suggest that participants may have had a better sense of their fall risk than with a test that provides a snapshot of their balance.© 2016 American Physical Therapy Association.

24 keywords...

hide…