• La Radiologia medica · Dec 2020

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Baseline chest X-ray in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients: association with clinical and laboratory data.

    • Marco Gatti, Marco Calandri, Matteo Barba, Andrea Biondo, Carlotta Geninatti, Stephanie Gentile, Marta Greco, Vittorio Morrone, Clara Piatti, Ambra Santonocito, Sara Varello, Laura Bergamasco, Rossana Cavallo, Rosario Di Stefano, Franco Riccardini, Adriana Boccuzzi, Giorgio Limerutti, Andrea Veltri, Paolo Fonio, and Riccardo Faletti.
    • Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy. marcogatti17@gmail.com.
    • Radiol Med. 2020 Dec 1; 125 (12): 1271-1279.

    PurposeTo assess the reliability of CXR and to describe CXR findings and clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with positive and negative CXR.MethodsRetrospective two-center study on consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department of two north-western Italian hospitals in March 2020 with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR and who underwent CXR within 24 h of the swab execution. 260 patients (61% male, 62.8 ± 15.8 year) were enrolled. CXRs were rated as positive (CXR+) or negative (CXR-), and features reported included presence and distribution of airspace opacities, pleural effusion and reduction in lung volumes. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with nonparametric tests, binary logistic regression (BLR) and ROC curve analysis.ResultsSensitivity of CXR was 61.1% (95%CI 55-67%) with a typical presence of bilateral (62.3%) airspace opacification, more often with a lower zone (88.7%) and peripheral (43.4%) distribution. At univariate analysis, several factors were found to differ significantly between CXR+ and CXR-. The BLR confirmed as significant predictors only lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interval between the onset of symptoms and the execution of CXR. The ROC curve procedure determined that CRX+ was associated with LDH > 500 UI/L (AUC = 0.878), CRP > 30 mg/L (AUC = 0.830) and interval between the onset of symptoms and the execution of CXR > 4 days (AUC = 0.75). The presence of two out of three of the above-mentioned predictors resulted in CXR+ in 92.5% of cases, whereas their absence in 7.4%.ConclusionCXR has a low sensitivity. LDH, CRP and interval between the onset of symptoms and the execution of CXR are major predictors for a positive CXR.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…